geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lin Sun" <linsun....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Discussion thread for Geronimo Samples 2.1.2 vote
Date Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:59:56 GMT
Joe, thanks for the pointers.  I simply missed these discussions while
I was out in early Sept.  I agree that this should not stop releasing
the 2.1.2 samples.

Lin

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Lin,
>
> There have been several discussions on this topic.
>
> Here's the original thread:
> http://tinyurl.com/3e9tao
>
> Here's the most recent discussion:
> http://www.nabble.com/Samples---Why-are-the-tomcat-jetty-prerequisites-not-set--tt19435555s134.html#a19435555
>
> You can also find the decision documented in the samples 2.1.2 status page
> under "Should Jetty samples pre-req Jetty and Tomcat samples pre-req
> Tomcat?"
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-samples-212-release-work-items.html
>
> I personally agree that it would be best to have the samples only enabled
> for the proper server but this is really hitting on a larger plugin issue
> and if they should be installable on a framework or only within a
> tomcat/jetty assembly.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> Please reference this most recent thread which includes pointers to
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> I've tried plugin install via console.  Tried bank and
>> jaxws-calculator and worked well.   I noticed one issue:
>>
>> Installable property is not marked correctly mostly, for example we
>> mark jetty app plugin as installable on tomcat assembly.   I think
>> only one or two is marked correctly initially.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> This a thread to discuss any issues as a result of the Geronimo Samples
>>> 2.1.2 vote candidate.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message