geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: Java doc is Geronimo 2.0.1 API
Date Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:51:06 GMT
I suggest we create an intermediate page in the wiki to list the  
javadoc versions, and link to that from the sidenav instead of going  
directly to 2.1.3.


On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:18 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

> I built and checked in the server 2.1.3 javadocs.  This seemed to be  
> the most expedient thing to do but there are some concerns:
> #1 This is a huge amount of content to include in svn.  I think  
> infra will not be happy with us.
> #2 Given #1, I debated deleting the 2.0.1 javadoc.  However, this  
> won't save anything given that svn must keep the history.  It will  
> save anyone from getting all of the 2.0.1 content if they check out  
> the site trunk.  What do you think, should we delete or keep 2.0.1  
> javadoc?
> #3 Also given #1, it's probably a good thing that we haven't done  
> this for each release.  Perhaps we should just do this once for each  
> major version?  Thoughts?
> #4 We had discussed using the maven generated site rather than  
> distributing this javadoc.  However that also presents some problems:
> - Currently it doesn't build for tags/2.1.3 (at least not for me).
> - When it does build, the javadoc is per module/project.  So rather  
> than a complete view of javadoc as with that just checked in you  
> must first navigate to the module of interest and then you can view  
> the javadoc for that module. This doesn't seem as useful to me.
> I'm not sure if I want to take the time to investigate the mvn site  
> issues right now .... anybody else interested?
> Joe
> Ted Kirby wrote:
>>> From the home page, if I choose Javadoc as the first choice under  
>>> the
>> Development section of the left nav bar, I get 2.0.1 Javadoc.  This
>> should be updated to 2.1.3.
>> Ted Kirby

View raw message