geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: boilerplate vs. framework as required plugin for custom server assembly
Date Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:55:22 GMT

On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Lin Sun wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have been looking at GERONIMO-4226 today.
>
> For a while, we have been recommending users to pick boilerplate as a
> required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
> working server.   However, this working server isn't really working,
> as a user won't be able to start the server using gshell (see G4226).
>
> I am proposing to recommend users to pick the framework plugin group
> (org.apache.geronimo.plugingroups/framework/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car) as the
> required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
> working server.    I don't think this is possible with 2.1.x releases
> as the framework plugin group doesn't exist there.   Any issue with
> that?  If no, I'll update our code and user docs.

I agree, this was my (IIRC not expressed) intention when originally  
thinking about the framework plugin group.  I think it's used this way  
in all our assemblies already.

thanks for picking this up.... it fell off my radar.
david jencks


>
>
> Lin


Mime
View raw message