geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: source-repository (in plugin metadata) and default-repository (in plugin catalog)
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:56:43 GMT
Sounds good.  That was the way I thought it was/should work.


-Donald


Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We provide source-repository in plugin metadata and default-repository
> in plugin catalog.
> 
> Currently, (I think this is how it works) when we install a plugin
> from a remote repo A, if the installation is not restricted to the
> particular repo A:
> 
> If the plugin specifies 1+ source-repository, we'll use that and
> ignore the default-repository specified in plugin catalog.
> 
> If the plugin doesn't specify any source-repository, we'll use the
> default-repository specified in the plugin catalog.
> 
> I 'd like to change it to:
> 
> If the plugin specifies 1+ source-repository, we'll use that AND the
> default-repository specified in plugin catalog.
> 
> I think that would give us more flexibility.   Thoughts?
> 
> P.S. this is related to this thread on user list where a user wants to
> install active mq on top of little G env -
> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-add-activemq-to-little-g--to19837127s134.html
> 
> Lin
> 

Mime
View raw message