geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: boilerplate vs. framework as required plugin for custom server assembly
Date Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:27:53 GMT
I believe there are too many c-m-p and plugin/pluginprofile 
changes/additions to warrant adding this into the 2.1 maintenance stream.


-Donald


Jack Cai wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> Can we create the framework plugin group for 2.1.x too if this does not 
> take too much? Thanks in advance!
> 
> Jack
> 
> 2008/10/9 Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com <mailto:linsun.unc@gmail.com>>
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     I have been looking at GERONIMO-4226 today.
> 
>     For a while, we have been recommending users to pick boilerplate as a
>     required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
>     working server.   However, this working server isn't really working,
>     as a user won't be able to start the server using gshell (see G4226).
> 
>     I am proposing to recommend users to pick the framework plugin group
>     (org.apache.geronimo.plugingroups/framework/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car) as the
>     required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
>     working server.    I don't think this is possible with 2.1.x releases
>     as the framework plugin group doesn't exist there.   Any issue with
>     that?  If no, I'll update our code and user docs.
> 
>     Lin
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message