geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: dojo-tomcat/jetty6
Date Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:12:49 GMT
That should have been fixed back on Oct. 9 in r703291 by Jay.



-Donald


Ivan wrote:
> Just find in the newest snapshot, after I manually install the dojo 
> plugin, it has an extra folder "dojo", currently when we want the refer 
> to dojo.js, the url will be /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js.
> I suggest to repackage the dojo-mini.zip file.
> 
> 
> 2008/10/8 Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com <mailto:linsun.unc@gmail.com>>
> 
>     Hi Manu, Ok, making it optional sounds good.
> 
>     Lin
> 
>     On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Manu George <manu.t.george@gmail.com
>     <mailto:manu.t.george@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > Hi Lin,
>      >
>      > I am using it in the EjbServer Portlet I am developing. But I guess
>      > that it can also be made an optional console plugin
>      >
>      > Regards
>      > Manu
>      >
>      > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com
>     <mailto:linsun.unc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      >> Jay,
>      >>
>      >> Right, I don't know how far that work went either.
>      >>
>      >> Thus, I didn't include the dojo-tomcat/jetty6 in the new
>      >> javaee5-tomcat/jetty plugin group(profile), which will be used to
>      >> build the javaee5 assemblies.
>      >>
>      >> Lin
>      >>
>      >> n Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Jay D. McHugh
>     <jaydmchugh@gmail.com <mailto:jaydmchugh@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      >>> Lin,
>      >>>
>      >>> Someone was working on upgrading the views in Geronimo to use the
>      >>> widgets in the new version of Dojo.  I don't know how far that
>     work went.
>      >>>
>      >>> So, I believe you are correct that the legacy set are the only
>     ones that
>      >>> are currently in use.
>      >>>
>      >>> Jay
>      >>>
>      >>> Lin Sun wrote:
>      >>>> I think these two portlets are using the
>     dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6.
>      >>>> Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6
as
>      >>>> dependency.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Lin
>      >>>>
>      >>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods
>     <dwoods@apache.org <mailto:dwoods@apache.org>> wrote:
>      >>>>> I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need
>     Dojo right
>      >>>>> now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and
>     let users
>      >>>>> optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome
>     portlet to include
>      >>>>> some information about what optional Console plugins are
>     available....
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>> -Donald
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>      >>>>>> Hi,
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> I don't see dojo-tomcat/jetty6 is used by admin console
>     right now in
>      >>>>>> trunk thus I plan to remove it from the javaee5 assembly.
  Any
>      >>>>>> objection?
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> Whenever we have converted some of our admin console to
use
>      >>>>>> dojo-tomcat/jetty6, dojo-tomcat/jetty6 should be
>     automatically pulled
>      >>>>>> into javaee5 assembly via transitive dependency, similar
like
>      >>>>>> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today.
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> Lin
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>
>      >>
>      >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ivan

Mime
View raw message