geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: boilerplate vs. framework as required plugin for custom server assembly
Date Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:41:10 GMT

On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

> I believe there are too many c-m-p and plugin/pluginprofile changes/ 
> additions to warrant adding this into the 2.1 maintenance stream.

I agree wholeheartedly.
david jencks

>
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Jack Cai wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>> Can we create the framework plugin group for 2.1.x too if this does  
>> not take too much? Thanks in advance!
>> Jack
>> 2008/10/9 Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com  
>> <mailto:linsun.unc@gmail.com>>
>>    Hi,
>>    I have been looking at GERONIMO-4226 today.
>>    For a while, we have been recommending users to pick boilerplate  
>> as a
>>    required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
>>    working server.   However, this working server isn't really  
>> working,
>>    as a user won't be able to start the server using gshell (see  
>> G4226).
>>    I am proposing to recommend users to pick the framework plugin  
>> group
>>    (org.apache.geronimo.plugingroups/framework/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car) as  
>> the
>>    required plugin when assembling a custom server, in order to get a
>>    working server.    I don't think this is possible with 2.1.x  
>> releases
>>    as the framework plugin group doesn't exist there.   Any issue  
>> with
>>    that?  If no, I'll update our code and user docs.
>>    Lin


Mime
View raw message