geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Continuous TCK Testing
Date Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:10:18 GMT

On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:05 PM, David Blevins wrote:

>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>
>> I would like to be involved too.
>>
>> But, I don't have any experience with either AntHill or Hudson.
>>
>> Has anyone used Continuum?  Would that be harder/easier to  
>> configure and
>> use than the other two?
>
> The first version of GBuild ran a mashup of Continuum/ActiveMQ/ 
> Maven.  No GUI aside from the TCK reports though, it just used the  
> backend part of continuum.  It ran fine till the machines got hacked  
> (not related to the testing software).
>
> Essentially the TCK was divided up into several individual build  
> definitions and each of them were put on a JMS queue.  Each of the  
> build agents would pull a build definition from the queue, run it  
> via the continuum backend, then send the results onto a JMS topic.   
> There was another agent listening on the topic who would grab the  
> results, add them to the rest of the results then rerun the report  
> tool.
>
> It wouldn't be hard for us to set that up again, we'd just need VMs  
> (the OS kind, not the java kind) on our two boxes so we can get more  
> parallel processing without port conflicts.
>
> Anyone know if there are these kind of VMs setup already?

Yes. Each box has 4 VM's :-) phoebe (tck01-04) and selene (tck05-08).

--kevan

Mime
View raw message