geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Discussion thread for Geronimo Samples 2.1.2 vote
Date Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:46:33 GMT
I'd say release as-is (if there are no major problems found) and fix 
this minor bug in the 2.1.3/2.2 Sample branches.


Joe Bohn wrote:
> The fix would be to remove the links from the view (see <history> below 
> for details).  Our current approach is to generate the maven site to 
> make the xref and javadoc available.  They are a little hard to find ... 
> but they're there (you have to navigate through the site to get to the 
> specific sample-war or sample-ejb and then look in the reports for the 
> xref and javadoc reports).
> I can make the update and generate a new release candidate without a lot 
> of trouble.  I'd like to wait to see if other issues are found or if 
> there is a strong opinion that we should release with this minor issue.
> <history>
> Originally, there was some complicated processing in the samples to 
> build and include the javadoc and xrefs in the wars themselves.  This 
> was all created without an eye toward releasing the samples.  The 
> process required some special pom configuration (which was messing up 
> the maven site generation processing) as well as some special build 
> processing.  For a user this was no problem.  They would execute "mvn 
> site install" which would result in the javadoc/xref being created and 
> then later included in the war file via a copy into the src tree prior 
> to the package lifecycle phase.  This wasn't workable with a maven 
> release process because it resulted in the local changes as you attempt 
> to release.  I also wasn't sure how we could do the combined mvn install 
> and site generation which was required for this to work.  So, as was 
> recently discussed on the dev list, we removed the javadoc and xref 
> links and generated a standard maven site.  You found a link to the old 
> source that I missed.
> </history>
> Thanks for checking it out.
> Joe
>  Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 10:44 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> This a thread to discuss any issues as a result of the Geronimo 
>>> Samples 2.1.2 vote candidate.
>> The EJB 3.0 calculator sample (e.g. http://localhost:8080/calculator/) 
>> contains pointers to two source files: and 
>> Neither is working.
>> Is this easily fixable? If so, we should fix.
>> --kevan

View raw message