Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16720 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2008 21:29:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2008 21:29:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30646 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2008 21:29:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30595 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2008 21:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30584 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2008 21:29:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:29:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:28:45 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527AD234C1BE for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <278186393.1219267724322.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lin Sun (JIRA)" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3469) From console: database pool doesn't work well if the name contains a / like jdbc/EmployeeDataSource In-Reply-To: <1575994.1189619372173.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-3469: ------------------------------ Attachment: G3469.patch Is there any reason to use pool name as the artifactId? I propose we use pool name as artifactId if there is no / in the pool, otherwise, we just use the pool name portion after / as the artifactId. Or do we want to let our users set their artifactId? > From console: database pool doesn't work well if the name contains a / like jdbc/EmployeeDataSource > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-3469 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3469 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: databases > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Environment: winxp + Sun JDK 1.5 > Reporter: Lin Sun > Assignee: Lin Sun > Attachments: G3469.patch > > > 1) If I create a database pool called jdbc/EmployeeDataSource, I won't be able to delete it from the database pool portlet page. > 2) Also, while creating a new database pool, it seems not giving the option to have different input boxes for the artifact name and the database pool name. They are in the same input box. This was not true for previous releases IIRC. For example, if I name the database pool jdbc/EmployeeDataSource, the full artifact name will be console.dbpool/jdbc%2FEmployeeDatasource/1.0/rar. This is undesired and error prune, as I don't want that / in the artifact name. > Seems fixing No. 2 may fix No. 1. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.