geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Documentation of new 2.2 features in current wiki?
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:58:09 GMT
Joe, thanks for doing this.  The maintenance of multiple spaces is worth 
enabling the community to start working on the 2.2 docs.


-Donald


Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
> 
> To get things moving I went ahead and did an export of the current 
> Geronimo 2.1 space (GMOxDOC21) and restored it as Geronimo 2.2 
> (GMOxDOC22).  I only changed the space name and the initial title so 
> there are tons of references to Geronimo 2.1 in this new space still.
> Here's a link to the new space:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/documentation.html
> 
> As you can see it looks a lot like the 2.1 space still since it has not 
> yet been updated with any 2.2 specifics (beyond a few title changes).
> 
> Everyone,
> Now that we have 2 spaces we will need to mirror appropriate updates in 
> the 2.1 space into the 2.2 space.  Please help us keep the doc 
> consistent where appropriate.  Also, feel free to update the new space 
> with specifics for Geronimo 2.2 now that we have it.
> 
> Rebekah,
> I think this should get you moving on making the proposed updates. 
> Please update/remove/etc... the references to Geronimo 2.1 as necessary 
> to reflect that this is for Geronimo 2.2.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe
> 
> 
> wei zhang wrote:
>> Well, only the Export/Restore actions require administrator authority. 
>> Others like move and copy pages can be done by author, and I have 
>> tried those actions.
>>
>>
>>  
>> On 8/19/08, *Joe Bohn* <joe.bohn@earthlink.net 
>> <mailto:joe.bohn@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Hmmm ... it seems that we might have a problem then.  If admin
>>     authority is required to export/restore then it is also most likely
>>     the case that admin is required to move pages and such for the
>>     proposed new structure.  It might not be possible for Rebekah to
>>     make these changes.
>>
>>     I'm also wondering if we are really at the point where it makes
>>     sense to copy the 2.1 doc to 2.2 and start incurring the duplicate
>>     maintenance costs.  There are not yet any 2.2 pages created under
>>     the parent page that we made for that purpose.  Is now really the
>>     time to export/restore?
>>
>>     Joe
>>
>>     PS.  I also attempted to do a quick export/restore with a very
>>     simple space prior to leaving for vacation.  I had some problems too
>>     ... I can't recall what they were at the moment ... I'll have to
>>     give it another shot ... but there might be more than just an
>>     authority issue with this process.
>>
>>
>>     wei zhang wrote:
>>
>>         Hi I tried the Export/Restore option David Belvins suggested,
>>         but couldn't make any progress because only the administrator
>>         can perfrom such actions. Can someone with administrator
>>         authority help?
>>          Thanks.
>>         Rebekah Zhang
>>
>>          On 8/19/08, *David Jencks* <david_jencks@yahoo.com
>>         <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com> <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com
>>         <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>            On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
>>
>>                Is someone working on copying 2.1 space to 2.2? :-) If we
>>         don't
>>                have a solution for the copy approach, maybe we just let
>>         Rebekah
>>                and her colleagues go ahead to manually copy & 
>> reorganize...
>>
>>
>>            David Blevins posted fairly complete instructions for the 
>> various
>>            options on aug 1 in this thread.  Is there some problem with
>>         doing
>>            export/restore?
>>
>>            thanks
>>            david jencks
>>
>>
>>
>>                -Jack
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message