geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Documentation of new 2.2 features in current wiki?
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:39:57 GMT


To get things moving I went ahead and did an export of the current 
Geronimo 2.1 space (GMOxDOC21) and restored it as Geronimo 2.2 
(GMOxDOC22).  I only changed the space name and the initial title so 
there are tons of references to Geronimo 2.1 in this new space still.
Here's a link to the new space:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/documentation.html

As you can see it looks a lot like the 2.1 space still since it has not 
yet been updated with any 2.2 specifics (beyond a few title changes).

Everyone,
Now that we have 2 spaces we will need to mirror appropriate updates in 
the 2.1 space into the 2.2 space.  Please help us keep the doc 
consistent where appropriate.  Also, feel free to update the new space 
with specifics for Geronimo 2.2 now that we have it.

Rebekah,
I think this should get you moving on making the proposed updates. 
Please update/remove/etc... the references to Geronimo 2.1 as necessary 
to reflect that this is for Geronimo 2.2.

Thanks,
Joe


wei zhang wrote:
> Well, only the Export/Restore actions require administrator authority. 
> Others like move and copy pages can be done by author, and I have tried 
> those actions.
> 
> 
>  
> On 8/19/08, *Joe Bohn* <joe.bohn@earthlink.net 
> <mailto:joe.bohn@earthlink.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hmmm ... it seems that we might have a problem then.  If admin
>     authority is required to export/restore then it is also most likely
>     the case that admin is required to move pages and such for the
>     proposed new structure.  It might not be possible for Rebekah to
>     make these changes.
> 
>     I'm also wondering if we are really at the point where it makes
>     sense to copy the 2.1 doc to 2.2 and start incurring the duplicate
>     maintenance costs.  There are not yet any 2.2 pages created under
>     the parent page that we made for that purpose.  Is now really the
>     time to export/restore?
> 
>     Joe
> 
>     PS.  I also attempted to do a quick export/restore with a very
>     simple space prior to leaving for vacation.  I had some problems too
>     ... I can't recall what they were at the moment ... I'll have to
>     give it another shot ... but there might be more than just an
>     authority issue with this process.
> 
> 
>     wei zhang wrote:
> 
>         Hi I tried the Export/Restore option David Belvins suggested,
>         but couldn't make any progress because only the administrator
>         can perfrom such actions. Can someone with administrator
>         authority help?
>          Thanks.
>         Rebekah Zhang
> 
>          On 8/19/08, *David Jencks* <david_jencks@yahoo.com
>         <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com> <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com
>         <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com>>> wrote:
> 
> 
>            On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
> 
>                Is someone working on copying 2.1 space to 2.2? :-) If we
>         don't
>                have a solution for the copy approach, maybe we just let
>         Rebekah
>                and her colleagues go ahead to manually copy & reorganize...
> 
> 
>            David Blevins posted fairly complete instructions for the various
>            options on aug 1 in this thread.  Is there some problem with
>         doing
>            export/restore?
> 
>            thanks
>            david jencks
> 
> 
> 
>                -Jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message