geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Documentation of new 2.2 features in current wiki?
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:43 GMT
Joe Bohn wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:25 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be nicer to create pages with 2.2 specific content
>>>>> somewhere under http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/index.html for now.
>>>>> Once we have 2.2 documentation space setup we can move the pages
>>>>> around. Or at least I don't think we should mix 2.2 content with 2.1
>>>>> content.
>>>>
>>>> OK, but who exactly is going to do all this wiki maintenance that 
>>>> you are proposing?  I suggest mixing the docs because I don't think 
>>>> it will be confusing with prominent enough labels and I don't think 
>>>> that wiki maintenance is going to happen, no matter how many good 
>>>> intentions people now have.  Furthermore I would much rather that 
>>>> anyone with the knowledge to organize the documentation and interest 
>>>> in working on it spend it on content rather than continual 
>>>> reorganization.
>>>
>>> I agree with Jarek. I'd prefer that we keep 2.1 and 2.2 content 
>>> separated. We've still got G 1.1 users. I don't see how a 
>>> documentation super-set is going to be viable, in the long term. At 
>>> some point, the documentation would need to be separated. Better, I 
>>> think, to start out that way and keep things cleaner for 2.1 users.
>>
>> If the 2.1 docs are complete I suggest we immediately copy them to a 
>> set of 2.2 docs and I will happily document new features there.  If 
>> not we need a plan.  I think there have been two basic ideas so far:
>>
>> 1. put new 2.2 docs go into http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV. A quick 
>> glance suggests this is currently mostly a combination of advice on 
>> how to develop geronimo and documentation that applies to released 
>> versions of geronimo such as 2.0 and 2.1.  I don't see any reason so 
>> far to think that this will be maintained better in the future and 
>> stuff moved from here to appropriate versioned docs.  How would this 
>> work?
>>
>> 2. Add 2.2 docs to the current 2.1 docs, clearly marked as for 2.2 and 
>> later.  If and when we copy the 2.1 docs to a 2.2 branch, we can 
>> remove these pages from the 2.1 docs and remove the "since" notices.
> 
> 3. Create a new space for Apache Geronimo 2.2 (similar to the spaces we 
> have for 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, and 2.1).  Add new documents specific to 
> 2.2 into this new space.  It would be fairly sparse for now.  When we 
> complete the 2.1 docs we can clone them into the 2.2 space and integrate 
> the 2.2 specific documents into the appropriate sections/structure.
> 
> I can look into what would be necessary to create the 2.2 space and add 
> a link to it on along side the other 5 releases.

I started to make a space for this but it really isn't ready for use 
yet.  I need to catch up with Hernan to figure out how to get it set up 
correctly (and/or keep experimenting on my own).

> 
> Joe
> 
>>
>> My impression based on gossip is that while it's possible to copy an 
>> entire wiki space it isn't possible to move individual pages between 
>> spaces.  Is this correct?  If so IMNSHO (1) will never work with 
>> confluence. If not I think there's at least one page I'd like to 
>> move.... instructions would be great.
>>
>> Anyone have another idea?
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message