geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: CXF 2.0.7 for G 2.1.2? - [Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1]
Date Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:02:35 GMT

2.0.6 is fine ... I only noticed the problems with 2.0.7.  Something 
must have changed that requires comparable Geronimo changes.

Joe


Daniel Kulp wrote:
> 
> Was 2.0.6 OK or did it have the same TCK issues?
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF 2.0.7 and hit some issues with the 
>> TCK tests under Geronimo.  There must be some Geronimo changes 
>> necessary for this upgrade.  We'll hold-off upgrading to 2.0.7 for 
>> 2.1.2 unless someone has a chance to look into the tck issues before 
>> out branch.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Should we be considering CXF 2.0.7 for Geronimo 2.1.2? Does anybody 
>>> know of specific reasons to move to 2.0.7 or hold at 2.0.6?
>>> Joe
>>> Reference this portion of post by Dan Kulp on the user list:
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Using WS-Security with Geronimo 2.1.1
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
>>> From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
>>> Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
>>> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
>>> References: 
>>> <OFFAC5A3FD.692CBA0E-ONC1257474.003F56EE-C1257474.0042914C@LocalDomain>

>>> <add18bc80806260712t4eccb9c9o7fbff28562162d13@mail.gmail.com> 
>>> <OF80AFEB70.45376D71-ONC1257475.002E6337-C1257475.002F5E5C@LocalDomain>

>>> <add18bc80806270624h403fda54i6a107b4d3eb80012@mail.gmail.com> 
>>> <OF48817414.1A6C6BC0-ONC1257475.005266C9-C1257475.00530092@LocalDomain>

>>> <e92248920806271230o74e5682du9900158114989c8f@mail.gmail.com> 
>>> <435270830806300402x4edb9cb0tdedfc4c0f0badd6d@mail.gmail.com> 
>>> <e92248920807010231u4add2d83n5f93a9000a0eac6e@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Geronimo pretty much includes just the parts of CXF that are needed 
>>> to pass
>>> the JAX-WS parts of the TCK.   It doesn't include the "extra" things 
>>> like
>>> ws-addressing, ws-security, ws-rm, aegis databinding, etc....    
>>> Geronimo
>>> didn't need them so they didn't pull them in.
>>> When adding the jar like that, keep in mind that you may need other
>>> dependencies like wss4j, xml-sec, etc.. that ws-security requires 
>>> that might
>>> not be shipped with Geronimo.
>>> One thing to keep in mind is that the CXF ws-security implementation 
>>> (and
>>> the Axis2/Rampart implementation as well) is based on WSS4J which 
>>> isn't up
>>> to WS-Security 1.1 level yet.   Some of the profiles it supports are 
>>> "close"
>>> to 1.1 levels, but for the most part, it's 1.0.   A note to the wss4j 
>>> dev
>>> list (wss4j-dev@ws.apache.org) would probably a good start to figure out
>>> what wss4j supports.
>>> That said, it would be great if Geronimo could update to CXF 2.0.7
>>> (non-incubator) for a 2.1.2 release.
>>> <snip/>
>>
> 
> ---
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message