geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.2 Release
Date Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:14:48 GMT
How about trying to upgrade trunk first and then backport to 2.1.2 if 
all goes well....


-Donald


Jason Warner wrote:
> We might want to think about updating derby.  I believe we skipped over 
> updating to previous releases because of a bug.  See 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3545 for details.  The 
> issue is fixed in both the 10.3.3.0 <http://10.3.3.0> release and the 
> 10.4.1.3 <http://10.4.1.3> release.  I haven't really looked at them, so 
> I don't know much about new functionality, but our current derby version 
> is over 2 years old.  Any thoughts?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net 
> <mailto:joe.bohn@earthlink.net>> wrote:
> 
>     One more thing for 2.1.2 would be to upgrade to MyFaces 1.2.3.
>     <http://1.2.3.>  I helped them verify this via the Geronimo TCK so I
>     don't anticipate any problems.
> 
>     What other projects are at newer versions that we should consider
>     picking up for a 2.1.2 release?
> 
>     Joe
> 
> 
> 
>     Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
>         Hey Kevan,
> 
>         I agree that it would be nice to get a 2.1.2 release out soon.
>          I've seen a number of duplicate JIRAs reported that are already
>         fixed in 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT.
> 
>         some more comments inline ...
> 
>         Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
> 
>             Not a whole lot of discussion, so far. I'm going to leave
>             this open a while longer... Hoping we can see a few more
>             opinions voiced.
> 
>             To date, we have identified the following non-server related
>             work items:
> 
>             1) New JavaMail release to pick up the recent fixes -- I
>             totally agree. Happy to see the cooperation between the
>             Geronimo and James projects. Do we think we're at a
>             reasonable point for a new JavaMail release?
> 
>         +1 ... agree that it would be good to get a javamail release and
>         pick it up in 2.1.2. <http://2.1.2.>
> 
>             2) GEP 2.1.2 that supports Eclipse Ganymede -- I'd like to
>             see this also. However, I don't think this is a GEP
>             discussion and need not occur prior to our server release
>             discussion.
> 
>         Agree .. this doesn't really impact a server 2.1.2 release.
> 
>             3) TranQL Oracle RAC connector -- would be nice to see. Do
>             we have an expectation on when this could be provided?
>             4) Release DayTrader 2.1 -- I'd like to see this, also.
>             Anybody willing to work on making this happen? I don't think
>             that this is a hard requirement for a 2.1.2 release.
> 
>         I expect this would be independent of a 2.1.2 server release.
> 
>             5) Samples -- We're currently discussing a release of our
>             samples. I'd certainly expect that our samples will work on
>             2.1.2 and expect that we'll test and verify this.
> 
>         Hopefully this will be the case, but at the moment the samples
>         are still tied to a specific server release.  However, I think
>         the samples issue can be handled independent of a 2.1.2 server
>         release.
> 
> 
>             One additional fixes that I'd like to see:
> 
>             GERONIMO-4131 Identifies an issue with our RA deployment. I
>             think we should get this fixed.
> 
>             There may be others. Will take a look at the Jira's.
> 
>             Any Release Manager volunteers?
> 
> 
>         Since this is still fresh in my mind from 2.1.1 I would be
>         willing to act as the Release Manager again for 2.1.2 if there
>         are no other volunteers.
> 
> 
>             --kevan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Jason Warner

Mime
View raw message