geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lin Sun" <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Server Respository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+ - RC2
Date Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:47:32 GMT
I have to say that it is not very obvious - at least I didn't notice
it when I installed it from console the first time.   Also, I think as
long as you have the right value osi-approved="true" in the
geronimo-plugins.xml at the official site, it should be ok.    Looks
to me that the page is reading the site's geronimo-plugins.xml file
for the plugin's detail information instead of the sample's
geronimo-plugin.xml file.


On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Joe Bohn <> wrote:
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the vote for
>> the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+
>> Joe
> Jarek posted an concern in his vote on this plugin:
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> +1
>> One minor comment: when installing the plugin using the admin console
>> it shows the license as:
>> License:      The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Proprietary)
>> and should be :
>> License:      The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Open Source)
> As you can see, he still voted +1.  However, this concerns me.  I guess
> there must be something that I need to set for the plugin in the pom.xml to
> indicate that this is apache licensed.  The generated geronimo-plugin.xml
> includes  <license osi-approved="false">The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</license> rather than indicating true for osi-approved.
> So ... what to do with the vote?  I really don't like the erroneous license
> message.  I'm leaning toward cancelling the vote again to get this fixed.
>  What are your opinions?
> Joe

View raw message