geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jarek Gawor" <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Server Respository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+ - RC2
Date Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:36:43 GMT
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Joe Bohn <> wrote:
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the vote for
>> the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+
>> Joe
> Jarek posted an concern in his vote on this plugin:
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> +1
>> One minor comment: when installing the plugin using the admin console
>> it shows the license as:
>> License:      The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Proprietary)
>> and should be :
>> License:      The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Open Source)
> As you can see, he still voted +1.  However, this concerns me.  I guess
> there must be something that I need to set for the plugin in the pom.xml to
> indicate that this is apache licensed.  The generated geronimo-plugin.xml
> includes  <license osi-approved="false">The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</license> rather than indicating true for osi-approved.
> So ... what to do with the vote?  I really don't like the erroneous license
> message.  I'm leaning toward cancelling the vote again to get this fixed.
>  What are your opinions?

I voted +1 becuase the LICENSE file in the car file makes it clear
what the plugin license is. Also, the users will see this erroneous
license message if they install the plugin via the console and I think
most users will install it using the command line tools.


View raw message