geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shiva Kumar H R" <shiv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Reducing the dojo footprint in Geronimo
Date Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:57:25 GMT
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Shrey Banga wrote:
>
>
>> As for the including the rest of DojoX, since it a significant part of the
>> reducing effort.  Would it make sense to build a custom js for monitoring,
>> remove the rest of DojoX and if the development starts shifting to a real
>> need for DojoX to make a decision to bring it back in the future?
>>
>> I think that makes perfect sense- not only will this do the part in
>> reducing the dojo footprint, it'll also be useful as an example to how dojo
>> should be used optimally in deployment. Another desirable side-effect would
>> be reduced load times in the monitoring application, although currently that
>> is not an issue.
>>
>
> I'm starting to think that our server should deliver dojo support that is
> targeted to the requirements of the admin console.
>
> For general dojo support, we could provide an installable dojo plugin
> that's equivalent to the /dojo support we currently provide...
>
Perfect. I am +1.


> --kevan
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shiva

Mime
View raw message