geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <>
Subject Re: Reducing the dojo footprint in Geronimo
Date Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:44 GMT

On Jun 27, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Shrey Banga wrote:

> As for the including the rest of DojoX, since it a significant part  
> of the reducing effort.  Would it make sense to build a custom js  
> for monitoring, remove the rest of DojoX and if the development  
> starts shifting to a real need for DojoX to make a decision to bring  
> it back in the future?
> I think that makes perfect sense- not only will this do the part in  
> reducing the dojo footprint, it'll also be useful as an example to  
> how dojo should be used optimally in deployment. Another desirable  
> side-effect would be reduced load times in the monitoring  
> application, although currently that is not an issue.

I'm starting to think that our server should deliver dojo support that  
is targeted to the requirements of the admin console.

For general dojo support, we could provide an installable dojo plugin  
that's equivalent to the /dojo support we currently provide...


View raw message