Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96145 invoked from network); 13 May 2008 03:36:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2008 03:36:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 6026 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 03:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5976 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 03:36:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5965 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2008 03:36:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:36:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.28] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 03:35:28 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so1565665ywt.85 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=jHGrRBtPg/HNUtPAEs/a4xnGx7U7YyA99UrdCVVwLGc=; b=J/NSkZiTqDEiT0MB7o+XvCPKIYM0P1crOCjMKGuM3XuKbcY7FM4jxC4UYdBTXP6tk4X0MsWOUU2w/ROgg6Nz9B5fybXP8EZJVCo0A8Cqwd5ND9drQNw2oCdpoYkdjFKjj9EnzCSowRcPVbRii2+RVpzm4rTFq7xb1rViyXX3/ts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=JZ+VP+FEgJkk+pGe2Hy1LSo+KtemLHZaFJbI0PslCnjjmSX/J1lgtQzPMmwgnQFgCLrtp4fVMuhgdMa/9WYJ3goN/4bl1lKrBX8YBlviBGjB8cvTZtqe8i8akckImIaoS/Ot4P0iBDZFWsattHRXkyA2abUzr4aRD/0UuTgmA7Y= Received: by 10.150.83.22 with SMTP id g22mr6547939ybb.134.1210649733045; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.183? ( [65.190.205.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm15865027ywg.6.2008.05.12.20.35.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 May 2008 20:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4828F6DA.4000403@earthlink.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-414296791 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: Upgrade trunk/branches 2.1.x to use Tomcat 6.0.16 Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 23:35:30 -0400 References: <73a75e430805121732r599acd6t7fa872b451651a8b@mail.gmail.com> <4828F6DA.4000403@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-18-414296791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On May 12, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > +1 .... I think it makes sense to upgrade if you've built with the > fixes that we need to have included and it doesn't create any other > problems (esp. TCK issues). Agreed. I think we should fix in both trunk and branches/2.1 --kevan > > Jason Warner wrote: >> Through some testing, I found that the NIO connector in Tomcat >> 6.0.14 has some issues handling heavy load. These issues appear to >> be fixed in Tomcat 6.0.16. I'd like to upgrade >> trunk to use this new version of tomcat. I was going to upgrade >> branches 2.1.x while I was at it. Any objections? >> Thanks, >> -- >> ~Jason Warner > --Apple-Mail-18-414296791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On May 12, 2008, = at 10:03 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:


+1 = .... I think it makes sense to upgrade if you've built with the fixes = that we need to have included and it doesn't create any other problems = (esp. TCK issues).

Agreed. I think we = should fix in both trunk and = branches/2.1

--kevan


Jason Warner wrote:
Through some testing, I found that the NIO connector in = Tomcat 6.0.14 has some issues handling heavy load.  These issues = appear to be fixed in Tomcat 6.0.16. <http://6.0.16.>  I'd like to upgrade = trunk to use this new version of tomcat.  I was going to upgrade = branches 2.1.x while I was at it.  Any = objections?
Thanks,
-- =
~Jason = Warner


= --Apple-Mail-18-414296791--