Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69619 invoked from network); 17 May 2008 21:08:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2008 21:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 93977 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2008 21:08:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 93930 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2008 21:08:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 93919 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2008 21:08:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 14:08:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.47] (HELO smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 21:07:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 46405 invoked from network); 17 May 2008 21:07:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=zsDEo5GxFdFY8IOGMp+fjd70bhI9tEaU1pGNSuS2jFTdM458JHwnaBLKzRpgAkBa7gAm8iXs18reGd+zuj84Jr1ZOG0P+mL8s7wv0TV5+gOyzJpTF0lrOyriwDMeXA0MnNjuLSUKA/70izFIfI3sfu/psOfWjQlc0UlCWwbihXU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (david_jencks@68.166.236.68 with plain) by smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2008 21:07:33 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: wRQrr88VM1k5.PKQ4GUUbEKP5GIfIHCP06dILBxTEQj_OnIJANw0eEK4Y83bmtTsBTAd1mZUeyFCA.BYWu6jPVAHGLn9eNA22a_IuiX26fhw2Pbic5uywzQf5I0- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: <1C8095D2-0955-42B2-9291-4B0EF749F0BB@yahoo.com> From: David Jencks To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50805171320n60e3ca19n94caa4f649db396@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: Why no Debian package of Geronimo Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:07:29 -0400 References: <17289364.post@talk.nabble.com> <1b5bfeb50805171320n60e3ca19n94caa4f649db396@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 17, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, jontto wrote: > >> I could not find a Debian package of Geronimo, is there any >> particular >> reason for this or has it just not got done yet? > > The latter is the answer I guess. Nobody took care of it yet. Would > you mind? Report a task in JIRA and work on it. > I'd like to know what this involves and why this is a good idea before anyone spends much time on it. I don't think we want to encourage anyone to adopt a non-standard server layout without a good reason, and without this I'd expect any packaging to consist of the tar.gz server distro. Now there's the question, which one..... we have about 5 now. I guess something that almost makes sense to be would be a "server construction kit" consisting of a geronimo plugin repository together with the framework server so that you could assemble servers of your choice. I think this is pretty different in philosophy from most debian packages however. thanks david jencks > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl