Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <1567220725.1211737555871.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Daniel (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4077) One placeholder on the Database
 Pools page is not filled with the actual value
In-Reply-To: <50941251.1211737315682.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel updated GERONIMO-4077:
-----------------------------

    Description: 
The Database Pools page provides information on how to configure the server or its modules to work with a certain data pool (which is cool).

The page displays those configuration properties in bold that need to be set to identifiers which are bound to this particular data pool, e.g. its ID or JNDI name (which is also cool).

Apparently, one placeholder was thereby forgotten to replace: the "jdbc/MyDataPool" value in the very first block is also printed in bold, but doesn't contain the actual JNDI name for the data pool.

For consistency, I think either all placeholders should show the actual values or none of them. If that's impossible, actual values and placeholders shouldn't be printed with the same formatting.

  was:
The DataPools Usage page provides useful information on how to configure the server or its modules to work with a certain data pool (which is cool).

The page displays those configuration properties in bold that need to be set to identifiers which are bound to this particular data pool, e.g. its ID or JNDI name (which is also cool).

Apparently, one placeholder was thereby forgotten to replace: the "jdbc/MyDataPool" value in the very first block is also printed in bold, but doesn't contain the actual JNDI name for the data pool.

For consistency, I think either all placeholders should show the actual values or none of them. If that's impossible, actual values and placeholders shouldn't be printed with the same formatting.

        Summary: One placeholder on the Database Pools page is not filled with the actual value  (was: One placeholder on the DataPools Usage page is not filled with the actual value)

> One placeholder on the Database Pools page is not filled with the actual value
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4077
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4077
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: console
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.1
>            Reporter: Daniel
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The Database Pools page provides information on how to configure the server or its modules to work with a certain data pool (which is cool).
> The page displays those configuration properties in bold that need to be set to identifiers which are bound to this particular data pool, e.g. its ID or JNDI name (which is also cool).
> Apparently, one placeholder was thereby forgotten to replace: the "jdbc/MyDataPool" value in the very first block is also printed in bold, but doesn't contain the actual JNDI name for the data pool.
> For consistency, I think either all placeholders should show the actual values or none of them. If that's impossible, actual values and placeholders shouldn't be printed with the same formatting.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.