geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r653588 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/framework/modules: geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/runtime/ geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/ geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo
Date Mon, 05 May 2008 21:07:27 GMT
Yes, this is intentional.  SLF4J has some optimized code to deal with  
"{}" strings for substitution.

--jason


On May 6, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM,  <jdillon@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: jdillon
>> Date: Mon May  5 13:34:06 2008
>> New Revision: 653588
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653588&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Start of custom SLF4J muck for Geronimo
>
>> -                log.trace("Checking if child is running: child=" +  
>> child);
>> +                log.trace("Checking if child is running:  
>> child={}", child);
>
> Is it intentional? Will it work without the numbering like {0}? I see
> it occuring everywhere in the submitted code so it seems to be the way
> it works, but thought I'd ask for some pointers.
>
> Jacek
>
> -- 
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl


Mime
View raw message