Joe Bohn wrote:
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> Also, I think we should just release samples for the 2.1.1 release (no
>> need to release samples for 2.1 in my opinion).
>>
>
> I was thinking the opposite ... release the samples for 2.1 and then
> attempt to leverage them in server 2.1.1 without a 2.1.1 release of
> samples. Assuming we get a solution as David suggests we could then
> potentially employ that solution for future 2.1.x releases.
>
Agreed. It would be nice to see a samples release have a longevity of a
few minor releases. For example, samples 2.1 release working for all
2.1.x releases.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
|