geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Date Mon, 12 May 2008 18:47:10 GMT
Ted Kirby wrote:
> I'd like to get G4009 in if possible.  I have provided a patch to fix
> some HTML errors and warnings, although the sample runs without this
> patch.

Thanks Ted.  I'll take a look at the patch.


> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Joe Bohn <> wrote:
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
>> (
>>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
>> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>> Joe
>>  BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
>> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
>> etc....).  I was more looking for input regarding the state of the samples.
>> Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that a particular
>> sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
>>  Joe

View raw message