geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Date Mon, 12 May 2008 18:43:17 GMT
Donald Woods wrote:
> What about Daytrader?  It's been dormant except for one update since 
> last Oct. and is still at version 2.0-SNAPSHOT....

Good point.  My main motivation on the samples was to get something out 
there for Geronimo 2.1 which I think is long overdue.  However, it would 
appear that daytrader is even more overdue.

> Should we move it over into Samples, so it gets updated and released 
> with the samples?

We should get some more input on this.  I don't recall all of the 
reasons that daytrader was moved into it's own subproject. However, I 
have to admit that I'm hesitant to include it in samples prior to a 2.1 
samples release because I'm afraid it will make it next to impossible to 
get something out soon.


> -Donald
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples 
>>> (
>>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've 
>>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release 
>>> process).
>>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release 
>>> the 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new 
>>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>> Joe
>> BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing 
>> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are 
>> correct, etc....).  I was more looking for input regarding the state 
>> of the samples.  Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some 
>> reason that a particular sample under branches/2.1 should not be 
>> released at all?
>> Joe

View raw message