geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <>
Subject Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
Date Mon, 05 May 2008 11:13:15 GMT
Gianny Damour wrote:
> Hello Rick,
> Sorry, this is not directly related to your question. What kind of 
> integration with ObjectGrid have you been working on? FWIW, I am 
> working on a hierarchical, transactional, distributed, partitioned and 
> replicated cache and data-grid solution as part of WADI and I am quite 
> interested by this topic these days.
No real integration work, just helping the ObjectGrid developers with 
Yoko fixes when they attempt to run using the Yoko ORB.


> Thanks,
> Gianny
> On 02/05/2008, at 11:43 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM 
>> ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB.  This is a BIG CORBA 
>> application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko 
>> ORB.  The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko 
>> client and server, but also in different client/server combinations 
>> with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB 
>> at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested).  In the 
>> process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of 
>> additional logging to the core orb.  Things are looking pretty good 
>> and stable at this point.
>> Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko 
>> code rather than an official release.  Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT 
>> builds, I believe.  I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 
>> release so there's finally an official release level to work from.  I 
>> currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 
>> 1.0 release can get created.  I have a number of items I think need 
>> to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release.  
>> Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for 
>> the 1.0 release?
>> Rick

View raw message