Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        b=s782B61w/VAl9AdBHkLUIJQj2tydTOsGzQiDJOVZQHGK1kJnH40ZBOuRwhgo6iVgcMKVrDuG8tFSow4QbgBiNeetpZAwWaTsh+PA1HtZMJKPc9btpHJRwE7UpO4OwzVMX68RI0HTEkbz+5YDbpR2V5qnmP7jyUs2rb5eho+rDNw=
Message-Id: <6533347D-CB05-4579-BEA0-55802E6DA852@gmail.com>
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <3B641173-E128-4C75-B8C7-D8A96539AE17@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting write access to our Wiki
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:31:01 -0400
References: <4E1CC14F-B064-40D8-9ACA-1E84DACA66CF@gmail.com>
 <3B641173-E128-4C75-B8C7-D8A96539AE17@visi.com>


On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> It's already ASF policy that an ICLA be on file for anyone to get  
> write access to a confluence space used for official documentation  
> or a website (plain "wiki" usage is exempt).  Updated a good 40~  
> cwiki spaces to use the asf-cla group instead of confluence-users,  
> including ours, a couple weeks ago after some abuse so we're  
> compliant with the minimum policy.
>
> Some groups, like the Incubator, are talking that you need to be a  
> committer to get write access -- not just have a CLA on file.  I'm  
> not sure I see the need for raising the bar that high.  I like the  
> idea of the check box as an alternate to having a CLA on file,  
> assuming this is kosher with infra.

All,
I found the following source of documentation on the subject --

http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/#Index-Ifweusethewikitomaintainprojectdocumentation%2Carethereanyspecialconsiderations%3F

Looks like we have some choices. One of the decisions will be what to  
do about documentation that has already been contributed without a CLA.

I'd like to hear what the community thinks we should do...

--kevan