Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98249 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2008 14:50:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2008 14:50:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25268 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2008 14:50:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 25209 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2008 14:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 25198 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2008 14:50:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:50:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jgawor@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:50:00 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so5525ywe.85 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9kFtZijwf4J6bK/UZiGBOKcX2M0tW6rL4NyzqG+7Xxg=; b=lceqhzIJX1fjRZwa37my2ZwavXFqPQ8LcAN2PS7q6aggPzOqMnSAexGxdRwiMU653GuvpQMJrFMo/LGuO2dQGuQgDomALAo7wju8uHHq9gPQhXiLfS7ASobC3J6L6RFIjeDRJC/gAXrjqAC6xBb4Gd6aJwrkPZSfQuVy62+Vht8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TME19LBWpplzkPoGaeqnan0ynU/jiQXGCEErgXenESD6xRkjqH0/XZ+PRSvFxOiWnZaPcfpFPxejTqGcKOOeB+wWCv71JfaYiLNXCmVquEc+8jw3Ff6JTnOR31YTXyDwHVImMzavh3M3lrhQ8iC9I/gBG+vjiEuRdFnHeVAWqDU= Received: by 10.114.175.16 with SMTP id x16mr1901992wae.116.1207838999191; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.150.10 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5eb405c70804100749q4dd6aa8ci14dce81dac94700@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:49:59 -0400 From: "Jarek Gawor" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrading jaxb-impl 2.0.5 to 2.1.6 ? In-Reply-To: <47FE2790.5010303@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3C82B1AA-9128-4D87-9FB9-D93675832803@gmail.com> <47FE2790.5010303@earthlink.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yep, I agree with Joe. Also, make sure to update the JAXB API and the implementation. Also, we should run full TCK to make sure everything is still ok (or to determine what needs to be fixed). Jarek On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > Vasily Zakharov wrote: > > > Kevan, > > > > Do you mean we could switch the trunk to jaxb-impl 2.1.6 right now? > > > > I could prepare a patch and put it to GERONIMO-3951. > > > > Vasily > > > > IMO it would be a good idea to understand the current state of the tck in > trunk prior to attempting this so that we understand which issues are linked > to this change and which are not. > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Kevan Miller > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: > > > Hi, all, > > > > > > I see Geronimo still uses jaxb-impl version 2.0.5, while 2.1.6 is the > > > latest stable release. > > > Is there any particular reason for that? > > > What do you people think about switching to 2.1.x? > > > > > > I was recently investigating a nasty intermittent failure of > > > org.apache.geronimo.cxf.CXFHandlerResolverTest test on Harmony > > > (HARMONY-5625) and it seems the problem is in JAXB implementation. The > > > problem occurs on jaxb-impl-2.1.3 and earlier and doesn't occur on > > > jaxb-impl-2.1.4 and later. I suspect JAXB issue 383 [1] is the cause. > > > > > > In other words, bugs in jaxb-impl 2.0.5 are affecting Geronimo > > > operation, at least on Harmony, and that looks like a reason for > > > switching to a newer release. > > > > > > Vasily > > > > > > [1] https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=383 > > > > > > Hi Vasily, > > > Thanks for the info. JAXB 2.1 presents Java EE 5 TCK issues for us. > We're > > > working to learn from Sun how to pass the TCK w/ JAXB/JAXWS 2.1. Not > > > something that i'd anticipate for a near-term, 2.0/2.1 release. However, > > > don't see why we shouldn't start exploring this on our dev trunk (e.g. > > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT). > > > > > > --kevan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >