Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=IDzSVS3n9WArxLy1DRa0hRgRPyKz5NWQ7fmHaNkoYwB1nVHZpE6ZYF8/FFEvpxlRwkJ04Fnd6OKu7tQADKZ/pZ8934+zC7rjq54VbZ//KHx5LWqJy3Oq+H49ix+OT4TuYooY7dxeFF5DsLyGRNXy8z2svkjp8pmQ417STQtOWTQ=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
In-Reply-To: <517F18EE-120A-4DB2-AED4-3097A3FD6391@visi.com>
References: <4E1CC14F-B064-40D8-9ACA-1E84DACA66CF@gmail.com>
 <3B641173-E128-4C75-B8C7-D8A96539AE17@visi.com>
 <6533347D-CB05-4579-BEA0-55802E6DA852@gmail.com>
 <26E60EE5-4532-48A7-B8C7-8A12AFB8CEFF@visi.com>
 <23EA6384-4396-41D1-89BC-6AEAF6A7768C@visi.com>
 <73a75e430804212047r7a1fe552pda725b10a2d02a23@mail.gmail.com>
 <517F18EE-120A-4DB2-AED4-3097A3FD6391@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <526194FD-E6F8-4908-8FD9-0C996AF64665@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Doc IP Clearance (was Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting write
 access to our Wiki)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:24:28 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

Great work david!!!

I think some of these people are axis committers ... the ones with  
opensource.lk email addresses.  If they are, do we need another CLA?   
Or did you already look and my idea that they are committers on  
another project is wrong?

thanks
david jencks

On Apr 21, 2008, at 10:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:

>
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
>
>> This may be a dumb question, but what happens if a user submitted  
>> content and then submitted a CLA sometime later on.  Are CLA's  
>> retroactive or does the content submitted before a CLA need to be  
>> resubmitted?
>
> Definitely not a dumb question.  In the concrete case of someone  
> making contributions to project A then filing a CLA and later  
> becoming a committer to project A, I'd think the CLA would cover  
> all contributions.  Similarly, if someone made some contributions  
> and we asked them to file a CLA and they did, I'd count that as  
> good enough.  Likely some other scenarios which are less clear, but  
> those two cover the common cases.
>
> And speaking of CLAs, here's a report of users, and their edits,  
> for whom I could not find a CLA:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/gmo-revisions-no-cla.log
>
> I think the easiest thing is to just ask for CLAs from everyone on  
> this list (definitely some familiar faces in that list).   
> Afterwards we can deal with what's left which will be a process of  
> evaluating the contributions and making a judgment call on if they  
> fall under either the "minor patch" or the "major contribution"  
> category.
>
> -David
>