geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi
Date Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:17:56 GMT
Do you mean your -1 only apply to extending the behavior of the spec
in the J2EE environment,
and does not apply to extending the behavior in an OSGi environment ?
I'm not sure to completely understand your reasoning.

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant to say:
>
>
>  On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I'd like to see an example in action before I commit myself but so far I
> don't see any problems with this.  I assume you have already or will soon
> verify this doesn't cause problems with the tck :-)
> > >
> > > I wonder if a package name with "osgi" in it somewhere would be more
> appropriate?
> > >
> > > There are some specs (jacc for instance) that use a system property to
> figure out what to create.  I've always thought this was a less than
> brilliant idea and wonder if we can do something similar for those.  I also
> wonder if there is a way to generalize the osgi method so it might work in
> some non-osgi environments.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> > -1 technical veto
> >
> > These are spec jars and extending the behavior of these jars on an ad hoc
> basis is bad and possibly violates the licenses of the JSRs they implement.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message