On Apr 22, 2008, at 12:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Great work david!!!
>
> I think some of these people are axis committers ... the ones with
> opensource.lk email addresses. If they are, do we need another
> CLA? Or did you already look and my idea that they are committers
> on another project is wrong?
I did a manual look for CLA by last name for everyone who made any
edits. They might be there under a different name/spelling and
possibly I missed them.
-David
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 10:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
>>
>>> This may be a dumb question, but what happens if a user submitted
>>> content and then submitted a CLA sometime later on. Are CLA's
>>> retroactive or does the content submitted before a CLA need to be
>>> resubmitted?
>>
>> Definitely not a dumb question. In the concrete case of someone
>> making contributions to project A then filing a CLA and later
>> becoming a committer to project A, I'd think the CLA would cover
>> all contributions. Similarly, if someone made some contributions
>> and we asked them to file a CLA and they did, I'd count that as
>> good enough. Likely some other scenarios which are less clear, but
>> those two cover the common cases.
>>
>> And speaking of CLAs, here's a report of users, and their edits,
>> for whom I could not find a CLA:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/gmo-revisions-no-cla.log
>>
>> I think the easiest thing is to just ask for CLAs from everyone on
>> this list (definitely some familiar faces in that list).
>> Afterwards we can deal with what's left which will be a process of
>> evaluating the contributions and making a judgment call on if they
>> fall under either the "minor patch" or the "major contribution"
>> category.
>>
>> -David
>>
>
>
|