geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jarek Gawor" <jga...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:44:58 GMT
I agree with David. There is no need to cram everything into
server/trunk. Samples are now hooked up with the automatic Geronimo
builds so I think that should be enough (as long as people will
actaully pay attention if they fail to build ok).

Jarek

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>  On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>  > Donald Woods wrote:
>  >> Joe Bohn wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>> 2) When to release the samples?  I think we should make an effort
>  >>> to release the samples concurrent with each Geronimo release.
>  >>> This is important because the jsp & servlet examples are
>  >>> referenced from within the welcome page on Geronimo.  I suppose
>  >>> we could remove that reference and eliminate the need to release
>  >>> concurrently.
>  >> why not move the samples back under geronimo/server, so they are
>  >> maintained and versioned with each release and can then be used as
>  >> additional testsuite tests?  If not, releasing right after a
>  >> server release is fine.
>  >
>  > I was thinking about doing this.  It seems everybody thinks we
>  > should release them together anyway so what is the real value with
>  > them being split out?  Does anybody object to moving them back with
>  > the server?
>
>  well, since I thought our next goal with the server build was to
>  separate it into independently released plugins, I think putting the
>  samples in with the main server build would be a big step backwards.
>
>  thanks
>  david jencks
>
>  >
>  > Joe
>  >
>  >
>
>

Mime
View raw message