geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ 4.1.2? 4.2? ActiveIO 3.1? releases
Date Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:41:37 GMT
Yep, I'd like to see those fixes in 2.1.1, but maybe an ActiveMQ 4.1.2 
release that still supports Java 1.4 for existing stand-alone ActiveMQ 
users would be the best way to go for now.

-Donald

Joe Bohn wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>> Geronimo is still using ActiveMQ 4 and I've applied patches for or 
>> fixed a few bugs that are fairly important for getting MDBS working 
>> reliably and fixing other problems.  So, I'd like to get a release out 
>> of the 4.x branch for the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.1 release.
> 
> I agree ... it would be great to get those included in 2.1.1.
> 
>>
>> I've looked through the jiras for 4.x and applied the patches for ones 
>> that I had a clue about.  If anyone else wants something fixed in 4.x 
>> please speak up.
>>
>> ActiveIO trunk has a fix that we'd like (don't put non-strings in 
>> system properties) so I'd like to release ActiveIO 3.1 also.  Since 
>> that requires java 5 I'd like to update activemq 4 to use java 5 also 
>> (I've tried and this is easy to do).  What's the community feeling on 
>> this?  Is this a real no-no?  Would it be better to have the version 
>> 4.2 and preserve 4.1.x for java 1.4 work?
> 
> I'm sure others have more informed opinions on this than I do.  I 
> personally can't think of a reason that we should need another java 1.4 
> release but it certainly is nice to have the option ... so I think it 
> would make sense to do the java 5 work in a 4.2 branch.  Although I have 
> to admit that I'm getting a little nervous at all the moving parts for 
> 2.1.1.
> 
>>
>> I'd like to also update the poms to use more modern maven release 
>> procedures as well.... I haven't looked into this much yet and will 
>> post further when I do.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message