geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: WADI 2.0-M9 - Replace buggy 2.0-M8
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:47:01 GMT
Go ahead and update the 2.1 branch and trunk to 2.0-M9, given it's a bug 
fix.

-Donald


Gianny Damour wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A problem has been identified with WADI 2.0-M8 used by Geronimo 2.1 
> causing the failure of clustered applications when a specific node (the 
> node hosting the singleton partition rebalancing service)  is killed (a 
> normal shutdown is fine). WADI 2.0-M9 addresses this problem. This 
> release is backward compatible with 2.0-M8 and hence it simply needs to 
> be installed into the geronimo repository to upgrade from 2.0-M8 to 2.0-M9.
> 
> There are convenience download links for the 2.0-M9 artifacts on WADI's 
> home page: http://wadi.codehaus.org/
> 
> On a related notes, I will cut a 2.0 release for the next version of 
> Geronimo which adds the following features:
> * State, i.e. HTTP sessions and SFSB instances, are paged on disc in 
> var/temp/SessionStore after a configurable period of time in memory; and
> * Monitoring of global or Service Space Envelopes received and sent per 
> peer: 
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/WADI/6.+Monitor+Global+or+Service+Space+Envelopes. 
> 
> 
> When I checked in some basic support for SFSB clustering, I added the 
> ability to register arbitrary distributed services. I believe this can 
> be quite handy to implement the optional distributed job execution 
> features of the JEE concurrency API under development within the 
> sandbox. I wrote a WIKI page describing what I mean by distributed 
> services: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/WADI/2.+Distributed+Services
> 
> If people are interested by working on a Geronimo caching implementation 
> on top of the WADI's infra, then please ping me as this is the next big 
> feature I will be working on.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gianny
> 

Mime
View raw message