geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <>
Subject Re: micro-g vs. geronimo framework
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:27:49 GMT
Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for quite some time now. Would
it be too bad to call the assembly that way?

Lets face it,  Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal. Another thing in favor
of keeping Little-G name is that "minimal" would not be as representative anymore since the
Geronimo framework would actually the "new" minimal.


Joe Bohn wrote:
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or 
>> just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
>> I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if 
>> we agree to call it the same way.
>> If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it 
>> also matches the assembly name.
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
> If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ... then 
> should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently instead of 
> little-G?
> Joe

View raw message