Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for quite some time now. Would
it be too bad to call the assembly that way?
Lets face it, Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal. Another thing in favor
of keeping Little-G name is that "minimal" would not be as representative anymore since the
Geronimo framework would actually the "new" minimal.
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or
>> just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
>>
>> I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if
>> we agree to call it the same way.
>> If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it
>> also matches the assembly name.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>
> If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ... then
> should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently instead of
> little-G?
>
> Joe
>
>
|