Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55166 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2008 20:26:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2008 20:26:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 51735 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2008 20:26:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51681 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2008 20:26:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51670 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2008 20:26:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:26:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.189] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:25:46 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b22so291523rvf.55 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:25:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=49vu0msPUkOQ6z+0RdF7TwhEMWQHcuWKJfPE3c/OiaQ=; b=Lke67mZNUmWmzrJl5AcgReK1YM4B6ayS78GfAfRog99ian/dp601Uz7twN6tItVd9d10ZBVl/g3ydXNKbHCuElMR8vREGgKHG17DcXyxNQ9Ut2goBu/HFGEClm+mPK7YoIO2eJe+3wEE0dkvd+6vlT5bNuiIDMcNJDy71vCSxJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=ePqsa3bUdJGLpPPhsrISPYy3FgKStjT7fBIbP4nf1LH/K2jDjzraXq0x7iPE/gkv+cppvi0waNoZsck/d2uMGVgMsF+LGBMFMtoWsPf6AUDj6/GcW5z5+e/5iz3+Vmxgq/uYVw0sEugXrpEcbySqTXVszvEizJKSKwmOWrMCnc8= Received: by 10.141.180.5 with SMTP id h5mr1295341rvp.240.1203020754135; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from coltrane-009027041174.raleigh.ibm.com ( [129.33.49.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a38sm6533594rnc.6.2008.02.14.12.25.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:25:53 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5eb405c70802140906h6c557dacs133c7a232345afb6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: Concurrency Utilities for Java EE Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:25:51 -0500 References: <5eb405c70802140906h6c557dacs133c7a232345afb6@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > > Even if the RI thing does not work out or this specification does not > become part of Java EE 6, I still think this functionally would be a > good addition to Geronimo. > > What do people think? Thoughts, any concerns? Agreed. I think it would be great. My only question would concern licensing. As long as we have an api under an appropriate license (or can create one), seems like we could start this... --kevan