Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97480 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2008 12:51:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2008 12:51:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 84058 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2008 12:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 84021 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2008 12:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 84010 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2008 12:51:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:51:00 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.228] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:50:31 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2346366wxd.25 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=q8w1qLRe/KqAelPs+yEGn/XcGqILmvcf42dgjD2q+68=; b=Xz+sscrzhMuwbtsC1dIyAP5L6/iimGAE+XaPg0T0wbB322cvgmKQjdcLtXzJMzF4I2eA2mqSM4Tx2HjLfqxtj9FwlE1aYZamF1WVG5LpGU7s6WaRhx/73nittPUH0IwHOnNPAcqiAq03bZ25m1H2NC8z7ZVy+AqjVcHdPLHqKa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=JpsxQ+7xwwcxb4YFhCuMioaSKY+ImOQTdLW059RlRYUhHxpH8Zn6K4TewJr1wFHP2tSHsLLtOC/eFSPPz72/fBPXlwBhCvwdHCWXfsN+/XwTbJKSboDrw6bHc42sXk4lh6Wh/liYGv3/WcXs2Oy/1S1Xxri/C69TIr8MV/708+4= Received: by 10.142.52.9 with SMTP id z9mr4211631wfz.134.1202215835100; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.193? ( [76.182.118.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i19sm6816740wxd.33.2008.02.05.04.50.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:50:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-22-570333478 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release specs Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:50:32 -0500 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-22-570333478 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Third try ... > > Tags are here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ > > Staging repo is > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ > > I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any > concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. > > [ ] +1 release these specs > [ ] -1 another problem ? > > FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to > close the votes and move the specs > to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that > this vote is ok). I'll plan on calling this vote, in Guillaume's stead, in 24 hours. --kevan --Apple-Mail-22-570333478 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 1, 2008, = at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

Third try = ...

Tags are here:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geron= imo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geron= imo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb= _3.0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1= .0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/gero= nimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/g= eronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/= geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ja= cc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ja= xr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-= jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms= _1.1_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa= _3.0_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp= _2.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta= _1.1_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-sa= aj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo= -servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/gero= nimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/
 http:= //svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/

Staging = repo is
    http://p= eople.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/

I'm calling = a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any
concern, I = can create other vote threads if needed.

[ ] +1 release these = specs
[ ] -1 another problem ?

FYI, I won't be able for the = next two weeks, so I won't be able to
close the votes and move the = specs
to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided = that
this vote is ok).

I'll plan on = calling this vote, in Guillaume's stead, in 24 hours.

--kevan
= --Apple-Mail-22-570333478--