Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91073 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 16:48:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 16:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 17745 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 16:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17702 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 16:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17691 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2008 16:48:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:48:05 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.95.90] (HELO smtp127.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.95.90) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:47:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 24055 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 16:47:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=edtfJpjZJJ6/lW7L+JRTdWfuLFUz8KBfnr5ftdTlsoj3yt6LgxfZdpU36z84ElEqk2Yrrumsr7W4c3dm+VJEYux9ReVCjwUt8nVuHu/9cVhn99TnZid2mzdTG6YMD8hA2ZTCaPi44WURIWMJ4VRFj1f7OdSgRuXPUz2C2dTrR4A= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (david_jencks@67.102.173.8 with plain) by smtp127.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 16:47:43 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 5J.qrSIVM1k.b.kVCQbYP2R4KSozc4O341UhjLrjLjljoEuGuvdmfQiUyl1b55ROKVM6Y7QxJZsFkg7fo_mcoW2N4_N2Mu8FTtmy04bqC73tfK5h_yXg.zQ5J6_B X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: <5eb405c70802060815y7a8a19b8ta2319c1aa9ade9ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <5eb405c70802060815y7a8a19b8ta2319c1aa9ade9ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <86734A49-B2F7-4E86-8B51-8AB2B22874E7@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Inclusion of MySQL in roller-mysql-database plugin Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:47:39 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > Kevan, > > Can you explain what is the exact problem in this case? As far as I > know, the roller plugin doesn't actaully include or distribute the > msql driver. The driver will be automatically downloaded at compile > time (becuase it is specified as maven dependency) and when the plugin > is installed (becuase it is specified as a plugin dependency). Is the > automatic download the problem? If so, maybe we can remove the msql > maven dependency and modify the plugin dependency to specify the > driver as a prerequisite? At the moment I'd rather not distribute the plugin than make the maven dependencies inaccurate. I think using prerequisites is definitely an idea worth pursuing. thanks david jencks > > Jarek > > On Feb 6, 2008 9:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> All, >> I created a Jira to handle licensing issues involving the >> inclusion of >> MySQL in the roller-mysql-database plugin. See https:// >> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3816 >> >> I've insured that we will no longer build the roller-mysql-database >> plugin in our source code. However, there are multiple ways of >> handling this problem. Would like to hear opinions from the project. >> Ultimately, it's the PMC's responsibility to oversee the licensing of >> our distributions and to oversee the way we handle dependencies on >> artifacts that are covered by excluded licenses. >> >> The ASF Licensing Policy (currently it's a draft policy, but I think >> we should be following the guidelines documented there) are located >> here -- http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >> >> Discussion of how to handle Prohibited Works is here -- http:// >> people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html#options >> >> Would be good for the project (in particular PMC) members to be >> familiar with these issues. Would like to hear how we think we should >> address this issue. As long as I feel the PMC is providing >> appropriate >> oversight, I'm happy with what ever decision we reach. >> >> --kevan >> >> >> >>