Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60047 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2008 18:17:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2008 18:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 10017 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2008 18:17:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9972 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2008 18:17:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9961 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2008 18:17:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:17:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaw981@gmail.com designates 216.239.58.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.58.188] (HELO gv-out-0910.google.com) (216.239.58.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:16:34 +0000 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p33so60117gvf.27 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:16:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=XqMnK8zAp2//Dv642rqcAtwakEO/zS5qkg8x51U8+WQ=; b=PdlXHIngfpiKb4PC9SCuCettz8s+wZ3XNFI5hC7rDin9Icc3FlHVYYpHQm1R5QVkjbgk8w9jtwpTLXklQHzAr8eDSCDdAcAKbbyCSn9Pbx/YvfXYvBRPZJUuhJBwMZ0us+xbjPmqSSni+cHfbwvy4wFX8aY9ord7bP6O74el8S4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pUw13WSTPAB1YW4aWygA0D0WzxjQwtX+UUoS8VIQ914ChtvZ+S0TPgVKvD0UibyGuDUq1DjT1AMcR9lyS51Q7MdWExpqXJFekY4toYkvVd8nmeqFCf9HWmQjyCkCMoarNcLSMN6ZrQejrVGfqe/V9IVeyXiw07OXzq9znDjLCPo= Received: by 10.151.11.17 with SMTP id o17mr3275591ybi.51.1203617814392; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.85.7 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73a75e430802211016n38a6988ck4ca410f35e44f5f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:16:54 -0500 From: "Jason Warner" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Questions about using Gshell on a remote server instance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4213_26174257.1203617814390" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_4213_26174257.1203617814390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I was working with gshell in trunk and noticed something that I thought was odd. I had used deploy/connect to connect to a remote instance of geronimo. I then went to issue a geronimo/stop-server command but I didn't provide the hostname or port for the remote server. The command attempted to shutdown a local instance of geronimo. I was confused as to why this would be the case. My expectation would be that if I were connected to a remote instance, then any commands sent to a geronimo server would be directed at that instance. I think this behavior might confuse users. Is there a reason things are working the way they currently are? Is it technically feasible to accomplish this with the way the command is written or is it just not worth the effort? I'd like to see what other think about this, but I'm definitely going to document it in the wiki. Thanks, -- ~Jason Warner ------=_Part_4213_26174257.1203617814390 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I was working with gshell in trunk and noticed something that I thought was odd.  I had used deploy/connect to connect to a remote instance of geronimo.  I then went to issue a geronimo/stop-server command but I didn't provide the hostname or port for the remote server.  The command attempted to shutdown a local instance of geronimo.  I was confused as to why this would be the case.  My expectation would be that if I were connected to a remote instance, then any commands sent to a geronimo server would be directed at that instance.  I think this behavior might confuse users.  Is there a reason things are working the way they currently are?  Is it technically feasible to accomplish this with the way the command is written or is it just not worth the effort?  I'd like to see what other think about this, but I'm definitely going to document it in the wiki.

Thanks,

--
~Jason Warner ------=_Part_4213_26174257.1203617814390--