Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jgawor@gmail.com designates
 209.85.146.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=AA0/IbogpWH+d1OGcmaQt/7Gu6nabzvHPMxxy4ATT7sKXxcHoLtPoTt8OjWiHmNXUx/eAbu/5Q5VB6JzG80p5m7WzpCosva61tdGBwrqpOjjIsjCryuDsv3HPOuRROq6VFiQh0w1um37OlghVU5EiIFeiLOWa5f9jamuzHRkV3M=
Message-ID: <5eb405c70802211036x199fc0c7t854053ecf743cc42@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:36:22 -0500
From: "Jarek Gawor" <jgawor@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about using Gshell on a remote server instance
In-Reply-To: <73a75e430802211016n38a6988ck4ca410f35e44f5f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <73a75e430802211016n38a6988ck4ca410f35e44f5f@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, I've noticed that too. The deploy/* commands are not 'integrated'
with the geronimo/* commands. Looks like the JMX connection is not
being shared between these groups of commands. We should be able to
fix that. Please open a bug. Also, I just noticed that if an user
changes the default user/password the geronimo/start-server command
might fail with an error.

Jarek

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Jason Warner <jaw981@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was working with gshell in trunk and noticed something that I thought was
> odd.  I had used deploy/connect to connect to a remote instance of geronimo.
> I then went to issue a geronimo/stop-server command but I didn't provide the
> hostname or port for the remote server.  The command attempted to shutdown a
> local instance of geronimo.  I was confused as to why this would be the
> case.  My expectation would be that if I were connected to a remote
> instance, then any commands sent to a geronimo server would be directed at
> that instance.  I think this behavior might confuse users.  Is there a
> reason things are working the way they currently are?  Is it technically
> feasible to accomplish this with the way the command is written or is it
> just not worth the effort?  I'd like to see what other think about this, but
> I'm definitely going to document it in the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> ~Jason Warner