Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12706 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2008 07:40:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2008 07:40:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 62375 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2008 07:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 62325 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2008 07:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 62314 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2008 07:40:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of c1vamsi1c@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.204.234] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (72.14.204.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:39:59 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id d8so1144808qbc.3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ndq5rYnPLN72jwFy06YWLWtLqnOY5qb0M/tp6c1lGJg=; b=T/JqICBdHpplIT2r/vEpvWL0pZ5WNg8oYx2DqptfeBr45vxLrr9xTAlLIPvjPcdBDUf9YX3hw/Mk8wAlZX8nCZFNi1Jot3O3xmn3e3P7T+/y5b0scITOsVoaIvx3PrP4MpFU9j7wtOc1msDNmeUWbyhfbEExuEf9WqFWIHtdSzk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=i8rC3vXIGw7kp3vWOVsomOxsfENRGx29CplPOXKJXPvz0s2vrbvbx2p14rzpD1ZM7814a70Y1kSCD1K7EseG6ankMnuvsyPdHFbpIhMXIjCK01Fv+n37NUYzpuWM+LGeTHWuVLAuMD642NcaaEiVmh73uBRtlQfqb4tFECDQzl0= Received: by 10.142.178.13 with SMTP id a13mr48828wff.196.1203752406928; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.14.8 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <22d56c4d0802222340h6e3f29a7jbaa40020d858561b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:10:06 +0530 From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update In-Reply-To: <47BF25BE.4080704@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3395_25645664.1203752406909" References: <47BDF556.10909@gmail.com> <73a75e430802221011r3efa7affp9ec7725e7ea1448b@mail.gmail.com> <47BF25BE.4080704@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3395_25645664.1203752406909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: > "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release > but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to > update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it as if > you started before Geronimo was released, then you would have a bunch of > SNAPSHOTs all over the place). > If there is anything on the Need update column then there should not be a > green check mark on the status column. Does this make sense? what do others > think? I started using that column like a "comments" column which will let me know what & why the update is needed. Otherwise it will just be a complement of the status column. > > As for "...still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about > to update..." I would hope that the people who jumps into any of those > subjects can follow it through all the way. Otherwise this table won't help > us figure out how complete the content really is. > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Jason Warner wrote: > > Hernan, > > > > What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page? Is > > that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows > > what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1? > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Hernan Cunico > > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > an interesting thing happened twice already this week. Given the > > number of doc contributions that started to flow recently (THANKS TO > > ALL OF YOU CONTRIBUTING) we ended up having, or just about to have, > > some overlapping. > > > > Talking with some of the folks we thought it would be a good idea to > > put together some sort of table or a list with the topics and who > > was working on them. So, I updated the 2.1 doc home page and added a > > few more pages to help us figure out who is working on what. This > > should also help bring in new contributions. > > > > > > Here is the page, I already started to put some names there. Pls > > chime in and update the info with the content you are working on. > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation-development.html > > > > What to others think? > > > > Cheers! > > Hernan > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~Jason Warner > ------=_Part_3395_25645664.1203752406909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com> wrote:
"Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it as if you started before Geronimo was released, then you would have a bunch of SNAPSHOTs all over the place).
If there is anything on the Need update column then there should not be a green check mark on the status column. Does this make sense? what do others think?
I started using that column like a "comments" column which will let me know what & why the update is needed.  Otherwise it will just be a complement of the status column.




As for "...still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about to update..." I would hope that the people who jumps into any of those subjects can follow it through all the way. Otherwise this table won't help us figure out how complete the content really is.

Cheers!
Hernan

Jason Warner wrote:
> Hernan,
>
> What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page?  Is
> that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows
> what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com
> <mailto:hcunico@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>     an interesting thing happened twice already this week. Given the
>     number of doc contributions that started to flow recently (THANKS TO
>     ALL OF YOU CONTRIBUTING) we ended up having, or just about to have,
>     some overlapping.
>
>     Talking with some of the folks we thought it would be a good idea to
>     put together some sort of table or a list with the topics and who
>     was working on them. So, I updated the 2.1 doc home page and added a
>     few more pages to help us figure out who is working on what. This
>     should also help bring in new contributions.
>
>
>     Here is the page, I already started to put some names there. Pls
>     chime in and update the info with the content you are working on.
>
>     http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation-development.html
>
>     What to others think?
>
>     Cheers!
>     Hernan
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Jason Warner

------=_Part_3395_25645664.1203752406909--