Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1710 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 19:47:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 19:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 71557 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 19:47:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71502 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 19:47:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71491 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2008 19:47:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:47:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.231] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:47:31 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2870220wxd.25 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:47:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=2XhYr3SunR5lMr9AsUJJ0uZzAuSPYYelXEdkORfooRg=; b=pfp05kLMgCyYL5JboAk1GdKHRB6YbR5CtsJOG0PqQplHORhYnzRftgOk+lQv8Lay8veSsdiZayxIFvbwZGRT6TnFP3RBk5DyEjpCNcCVwunRxE8Xu9ZosiIpd2loAZp+mwQFJI7ZCCPWLFsvZp9cf40p2XAE5JY5ArHXTTrL7gc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=AcsgYkM01kMsAcWGPxtlrcD/PTiTkojkHRuXCVDXHccanELg/uuRMA1BfM/Fy4ofvT+rj06+kS8CGh0UIkAgEs3l+05YDF7yGbn6QS8oZ5WzEUHKLc3bW8xjeO26ZXaOg5157FA7Z8USBn/tJ1CmHewUqiuqenC7UQT9IPJKCaQ= Received: by 10.70.42.16 with SMTP id p16mr669678wxp.14.1202327243871; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.191? ( [76.182.118.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h34sm12339870wxd.38.2008.02.06.11.47.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:47:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <07F05170-B200-478A-8B50-BB88EB9A9B35@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-13-681736337 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release specs (Passed) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:47:15 -0500 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-13-681736337 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since Guillaume is away (hopefully on a well-earned holiday), I'm calling this vote, in his stead. This vote passes with 8 +1 votes and no others. Note that I'm counting Guillaume as a '+1', although he didn't explicitly state this. I'll start distributing the binaries. --kevan On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Third try ... > > Tags are here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ > > Staging repo is > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ > > I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any > concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. > > [ ] +1 release these specs > [ ] -1 another problem ? > > FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to > close the votes and move the specs > to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that > this vote is ok). > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ --Apple-Mail-13-681736337 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since Guillaume is away = (hopefully on a well-earned holiday), I'm calling this vote, in his = stead.

This vote = passes with 8 +1 votes and no others. Note that I'm counting Guillaume = as a '+1', although he didn't explicitly state this.

I'll start distributing = the binaries.

--kevan

<= div>On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

Third try = ...

Tags are here:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geron= imo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geron= imo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb= _3.0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1= .0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/gero= nimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/g= eronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/= geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ja= cc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ja= xr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-= jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms= _1.1_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa= _3.0_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp= _2.1_spec-1.0.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta= _1.1_spec-1.1.1/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-sa= aj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo= -servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/gero= nimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/
 http:= //svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/

Staging = repo is
    http://p= eople.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/

I'm calling = a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any
concern, I = can create other vote threads if needed.

[ ] +1 release these = specs
[ ] -1 another problem ?

FYI, I won't be able for the = next two weeks, so I won't be able to
close the votes and move the = specs
to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided = that
this vote is ok).

--
Cheers,
Guillaume = Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

= --Apple-Mail-13-681736337--