geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] How do we improve the user experience of the geronimo server?
Date Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:08:19 GMT
I think we should be able to use Selenium IDE to record a trip  
through these processes and then insert the recording into testcases  
in the test suite.  Anyone care to investigate?

thanks
david jencks

On Feb 29, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:

> That reminds me...  Security realms portlet is broken yet again.   
> Editing a realm does not work :(
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Shiva Kumar H R  
> <shivahr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some automated testcases which will make sure Admin Console  
> portlets are not broken:
> (the ones I can think of immediately from a Deployment perspective:)
> 1) DB Manager
> 2) Database Pools
> 3) Security Realms
> 4) JMS Resources
> 5) Plan Creator
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Shiva
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in collecting ideas on how we can improve user
> experience with the geronimo 2.x server, particularly, what type of
> testing we can do for each geronimo major release to identify probs
> and resolve them.
>
> I think it would be nice to have a set of test (either automated or
> manually) other than tck that we run to verify various functions in
> geronimo for each major release.   Currently, we probably only run a
> very small amount of testing other than tck, our automated testing
> during the build and the few samples we have.
>
> One thought is to add more test samples.   Seems to me people are
> trying different things with geronimo server and most of the stuff
> they tried are not covered by our samples.    Any ideas what other
> samples may be good to work with geronimo?
>
> The other thought is to grow test cases from our JIRA system or users.
>  Encourage folks to attach/contribute their test cases.
>
> Also, what g functions do folks think we need more testing?
>
> Thanks, Lin
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message