geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:44:38 GMT
Sorry but this does not follow our agreed policy of tagging the specs  
individually.  IMO the tagging is unacceptable.  We had a long drawn  
out war on this and I'm afraid I think that changing it without  
agreement is not a good idea and will lead to too much confusion.

I also don't think the root pom should have the list of spec modules  
in it.

I apologize for not raising this concern earlier but I assumed you  
intended to have one vote on all the specs rather than change the  
manner in which they are built.

-1 due to the tagging.

david jencks

On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> The tag is available at
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog:

View raw message