geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <hcun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Deployment plan docs
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:58:50 GMT
Dave,
we didn't ditch those docs, they just fell behind ;-)
thanks for making the updates.

Cheers!
Hernan

David Blevins wrote:
> So a funny thing happened on the way to the theater :)
> 
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:05 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> 
>> So the 10,000 foot perspective is that we are creating a conversion 
>> tool to convert the prior openejb-jar.xml into the new set of 
>> descriptors (geronimo-openejb.xml, new openejb-jar.xml, jpa 
>> entity-mappings.xml).  It is expected that all existing plans will 
>> work and no one will have to or even *should* migrate just yet.
>>
>> We are doing this for two reasons:
>>
>> 1.  There is significant investment in current descriptor format.  
>> These come to mind:
>>       - TCK
>>       - DayTrader
>>       - iTests
>>       - Samples
>>       - All documentation to date
>>       - All user-land apps to date
> 
> It seems we ditched the openejb-jar.xml documentation anyway.  I went 
> ahead and added it into GMOxDOC20 and GMOxDOC21.
> 
> I also noticed that these docs were also left:
> 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC12/geronimo-web.xml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC12/geronimo-ra.xml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC12/geronimo-application.xml 
> 
> 
> We support backwards compatibility of our plans, so these docs should be 
> fine for the most part.
> 
> Is there some rational for not including them?
> 
> -David
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message