geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Create a "Powered by Geronimo" page under Community
Date Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:54:09 GMT
Jason Warner wrote:
> Vamsi,  I think that falls right in line with what I was saying in the 
> other thread.  Take a look and see if you agree.
> 
> ~Jason Warner

Which I think falls right in line with what I said earlier in this 
thread too. :-)

Joe



> 
> On Feb 11, 2008 1:40 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com 
> <mailto:c1vamsi1c@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I am indifferent to whether someone is repackaging Geronimo or
>     providing a plugin on top of Geronimo.  All I want to know is if
>     something is running on Geronimo (or a derivative) in production.
> 
>     ++Vamsi
> 
> 
>     On Feb 11, 2008 9:44 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>     <mailto:kevan.miller@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>         On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> 
>>         Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on adding a
>>         "Ready for Geronimo" page under the Community section of our
>>         website...
>>
>>         How about we create a "Powered by Geronimo" page that would
>>         help recognize the projects that provide a Geronimo based
>>         bundle (like Liferay) and companies that provide applications
>>         or servers based on Geronimo (like Intalio and IBM.)
>>
>>         A sample can be found on our wiki at -
>>         http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSITE/Powered+by+Geronimo
>>
>>         Thoughts?
> 
>         I'm willing to listen to contrary opinions, but I'd be against
>         this. This seems to be listing sources for Geronimo support. As
>         defined, we'd be willing to list companies that rebundle (and
>         support) Geronimo, but not companies that support Geronimo
>         directly. We could fix this by redefine "Powered by" to include
>         those companies, also.
>         I'd prefer to leave the whole issue untouched... 
> 
>         --kevan
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message