geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:49:48 GMT
I'm also -1 due to the tagging changes.

David Jencks wrote:
> Sorry but this does not follow our agreed policy of tagging the specs 
> individually.  IMO the tagging is unacceptable.  We had a long drawn 
> out war on this and I'm afraid I think that changing it without 
> agreement is not a good idea and will lead to too much confusion.
>
> I also don't think the root pom should have the list of spec modules 
> in it.
>
> I apologize for not raising this concern earlier but I assumed you 
> intended to have one vote on all the specs rather than change the 
> manner in which they are built.
>
> -1 due to the tagging.
>
>
> david jencks
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
>>    http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
>> The tag is available at
>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>>
>> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
>> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
>> files have been updated with w3c license.
>> Please double check and vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the specs
>> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>


Mime
View raw message