geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Manu George" <>
Subject Re: Geronimo in year 2008
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:52:58 GMT
What is the point in having geronimo specific annotations? AFAIK there
is a mappedName attribute in the javaEE annotations which can be used
for mapping to server specific resource names. Is this completely
implemented in G? Probably someone with more knowledge on this than me
can comment :).

Regarding plan creator I can contribute to getting it completed.


On Feb 8, 2008 2:00 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <> wrote:
> I can immediately remember 3 prior discussions in reference to this:
>     i) "[DISCUSS/FEEDBACK] Usability improvements to Geronimo" mail from
> Prasad in Nov'07
>      ii) "[Discuss] What next?" mail from DJencks in Aug'07
>      iii) "[DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 - what's next?" mail from Matt in Jul'07
> Alright, here is my wish list - features that I would love to see getting
> into Geronimo in 2008:
> 1) Deployment Environment:
>     a) Plan Creator wizards (in Admin Console & in Geronimo Eclipse Plugin)
> for geronimo-application.xml and *many* other Geronimo deployment plans.
>      b) Geronimo specific annotations: To further simplify the specification
> of Geronimo deployment information, right at development time.
> 2) Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in (GEP):
>     a) Model framework for Geronimo deployment plans:
>  Currently it is EMF (Eclipse Modeling Framework). With every update to
> Geronimo deployment schema, it's a major pain to generate new EMF classes.
> If however, GEP uses the same model framework as that of Geronimo server
> (XMLBeans), then at least this problem would be solved. IIUC JSR-88
> DConfigBeans would be the ideal model framework for GEP - in that case even
> if the model framework of server changes in future, GEP would be unaffected.
>      b) Critical bug fixes
>     c) Make "Download and Install" option more intuitive
>      d) Customize Web Services Wizard:
> The default implementation of WTP's web services wizard embeds an Axis
> engine inside a web-app and then deploys it in a web server such as Tomcat.
> However this isn't the right approach for Geronimo as it already has a
> global web services engine deployed. Hence web services wizard's behavior
> must be customized when deploying onto Geronimo.
>      e) Better Remote server support
>     f) Testsuite Automation
>     g) Integrating JavaEE Samples.
> 3) Admin Console Tools:
>     a) Server Build Tool: For instance, a "button" to push that spits out a
> server with just what is needed for a set of apps and nothing else.
>      b) Cluster Admin Tools: Geronimo has a lot of partial clustering
> solutions. For instance there's WADI, native tomcat clustering, a terracotta
> integration, and many others. A cluster admin tool would be of great help in
> the setting-up and fine-tuning of those clustering solutions.
> I am stuck in 1) a) Plan Creator work for the past year or so and it is
> still not complete! So if I alone work on many of those features, God alone
> knows when I will complete them. Any takers/collaborators?
>  On Feb 7, 2008 8:28 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Geronimo had a great year 2007.  I don't need to re-list all our
> achievements listed in Matt's mail from 31st Dec 2007
> (  Now
> that 2.1 is also rolling out, I think it is time we start discussing what we
> want to do in Geronimo in year 2008.  Let us also discuss what we "must" do
> to make Geronimo an application server of choice.  I would like all of us to
> use this mail thread to put forth our thoughts (and any action items some of
> us may have already come up with silently) so that the community can see
> what great heights Geronimo will scale in 2008.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > ++Vamsi
> >
> >
> --
> Thanks,
> Shiva

View raw message