geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo v2.1 documentation update
Date Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:40:06 GMT
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release
> but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to
> update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it as if
> you started before Geronimo was released, then you would have a bunch of
> SNAPSHOTs all over the place).
> If there is anything on the Need update column then there should not be a
> green check mark on the status column. Does this make sense? what do others
> think?

I started using that column like a "comments" column which will let me know
what & why the update is needed.  Otherwise it will just be a complement of
the status column.



>
> As for "...still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about
> to update..." I would hope that the people who jumps into any of those
> subjects can follow it through all the way. Otherwise this table won't help
> us figure out how complete the content really is.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Jason Warner wrote:
> > Hernan,
> >
> > What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page?  Is
> > that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows
> > what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com
> > <mailto:hcunico@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi All,
> >     an interesting thing happened twice already this week. Given the
> >     number of doc contributions that started to flow recently (THANKS TO
> >     ALL OF YOU CONTRIBUTING) we ended up having, or just about to have,
> >     some overlapping.
> >
> >     Talking with some of the folks we thought it would be a good idea to
> >     put together some sort of table or a list with the topics and who
> >     was working on them. So, I updated the 2.1 doc home page and added a
> >     few more pages to help us figure out who is working on what. This
> >     should also help bring in new contributions.
> >
> >
> >     Here is the page, I already started to put some names there. Pls
> >     chime in and update the info with the content you are working on.
> >
> >     http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation-development.html
> >
> >     What to others think?
> >
> >     Cheers!
> >     Hernan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~Jason Warner
>

Mime
View raw message